‘Why don’t you just use a condom?’: Understanding the motivational tensions in the minds of South African women
Abstract
Objectives: To better understand the complexity of the decision that women must make when they are asked to negotiate condom use with their partner.
Method: A literature review.
Results: A key theme that emerged included unequal power in sexual decision making, with men dominating and women being disempowered. Women may want to please their partner, who might believe that condoms will reduce sexual pleasure. The use of condoms was associated with a perceived lack of ‘real’ love, intimacy and trust. Other factors included the fear of losing one’s reputation, being seen as ‘loose’ and of violence or rejection by one’s partner. For many women, condom usage was forbidden by their religious beliefs. The article presents a conceptual framework to make sense of the motivational dilemma in the mind of a woman who is asked to use a condom.
Conclusion: Understanding this ambivalence, respecting it and helping women to resolve it may be more helpful than simply telling women to use a condom. A prevention worker who fails to recognise this dilemma and instructs women to ‘simply’ use a condom, may well encounter resistance.
How to cite this article: Mash R, Mash B, de Villiers, P. ‘Why don’t you just use a condom?’: Understanding the motivational tensions in the minds of South African women. Afr J Prm Health Care & Fam Med. 2010;2(1), Art. #79, 4 pages. DOI: 10.4102/phcfm.v2i1.79
References
Ross D, Dick B, Ferguson J. Preventing HIV/AIDS in young people: A systematic review of the evidence from developing countries. WHO technical report series 2006;938:1–1337. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Reddy P, James S, McCauley A. The South African youth risk behaviour survey 2002. Cape Town: South African Medical Research Council; 2003.
Bankole A, Ahmed F. Neema S, et al. Knowledge of correct condom use and consistency of use among adolescents in four countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Afr J Reprod Health. 2007;11(3):197–220.
Lear D. Sexual communication in the age of AIDS: The construction of risk and trust among young adults. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41(9):1311–1323.
Stein Z. HIV prevention: The need for methods women can use. Am J Public Health. 1990;80:460–462.
Blanc A. The effect of power in sexual relationships on sexual and reproductive health: An examination of the evidence. Stud Fam Plann. 2001;32(3):189–213.
Harrison A, Xaba N, Kunene P. Understanding safe sex: Gender narratives of HIV and pregnancy prevention by rural South African school going youth. Reprod Health Matters. 2001;9(17):63–71.
Reddy P, Meyer-Weitz A, Van den Borne B, et al. STD-related knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of Xhosa-speaking patients attending STD primary health care clinics in South Africa. Int J STD & AIDS. 1999;10:392–400.
Jewkes R, Levin J, Penn-Kekana L. Gender inequalities, intimate partner violence and HIV-preventive practices: Findings of a South African cross-sectional study. Social Sciences and Medicine. 2003;56:125–134.
Varga C. Sexual decision making and negotiation in the midst of AIDS: Youth in KwaZulu–Natal, South Africa. Health Transit Rev. 1997;7(3):45–67.
Makubalo L. Sexual non-negotiation. Agenda. 1996;28(31):38.
Marston C, King E. Factors that shape young people’s sexual behaviour: A systematic review. Lancet. 2006;368(9547):1581–1586.
Jewkes R, Vundule C, Maforah F, et al. Relationship dynamics and teenage pregnancy in South Africa. Social Sciences and Medicine. 2001;52:733–744.
Pettifor A, Measham D, Rees H, et al. Sexual power and HIV risk, South Africa. Emerging Infect Dis. 2004;10(11):1996–2004.
Bradshaw, S. Vatican: Condoms don’t stop AIDS [homepage on the Internet]. 2003 [cited 2010 April 01]. Available from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/oct/09/aids.
Cohen J. AIDS in Uganda: The human rights dimension. Lancet. 2005;356:20752076.
Slattery H. HIV/AIDS: A call to action. Responding as Christians. Nairobi: Pauline Publications; 2002.
Rollnick S, Miller W, Butler C. Motivational interviewing in health care: Helping patients change. London: Guildford Press; 2008.
Full Text: PDF (229 KB) HTML XML

